Answer Key
Practice test 6
Choose the correct answer.
You answered 0 of 15 questions correctly in this part of the test.
- It seems that Earth is the only [planet that can] support life.
- That book is absolute rubbish. It's not worth [reading] .
- [Although] we hadn't received an invitation to the party, we decided to go anyway.
- It is absolutely essential that you [not be] late for the meeting.
- I got [caught] up in the book. It was so thrilling!
- It was sabotage and an act of [hostility] to our country.
- It's very [unfortunate] , but it seems we [overestimated] his skills and abilities. He shouldn't have been hired.
- You should [let] him say what he wants to say. It's his right, isn't it?
- Money [talks] ! You'll see what he'll [say] if you give him $10,000.
- I need to buy [an] umbrella. Do you know [a] good shop in the area?
- I'm sure Donna doesn't mind [being photographed] while exercising. She'd actually be quite eager to see the photos when she finds out.
- My cousin is not very nice; she is always putting other people [down] .
- George is easy to get along with. [Most people] like him.
- Why was the guy turned [down] for the job? He was definitely the best of the applicants.
- [You had better] call your boss and tell him about the trouble now before it's too late.
Fill in the missing words.
You answered 0 of 15 questions correctly in this part of the test.
Woman to Pay €200,000 for Adultery
An adulterous Spanish woman has [been] ordered to pay €200,000 in moral damages for the suffering caused to her husband by her illicit affair. The woman, [who] had three children by her lover, pretended for years that they were fathered by her husband, [according] to reports.
After years [of] suspecting her of infidelity, the husband, who can't be named, finally discovered she had kept a lover for six of the fourteen years the couple had been together. DNA tests showed that three of their four children had been fathered by the [other] man. The husband then took his wife [to] court, demanding compensation.
The court in Valencia, southeastern Spain, ordered her to pay €100,000 for the suffering she caused him. She fought [the] ruling, but the Supreme Court has upheld it, and doubled the damages to €200,000. Judges said that the compensation should be “higher than if the children [had] been killed in [an] accident”.
The wife was judged to [have] “acted negligently in the conception of her children”, and the concealment of [the] truth “only added to the pain caused to the husband”, who should be compensated correctly.
[in] her defence, the woman [told] the court her extramarital activities had been “passionate and irregular” and blamed her husband for [being] cold, unfaithful and disinterested in the children.
The court ruled her claims [were] not credible.